Urology Textbook
Clinical Essentials
By Dirk Manski, MD

 You are here: Urology Textbook > Surgical Management > Foley catheter

Foley Catheter: Indications, Complications, and Insertion Technique

Indications for Transurethral Foley Catheters

Two-way catheters with a thick channel for urine drainage and a thin channel for balloon occlusion are used for indwelling catheterization [Fig. Catheter cross-sections]. The catheters used differ in shape and material depending on the indication for drainage of the lower urinary tract.


Cross-section of a Foley catheter (left) and an irrigation catheter (right).
figure Cross-section of a Foley catheter (left) and irrigation catheter (right)
Advantages and disadvantages of transurethral and suprapubic indwelling catheters.
Transurethral catheter Suprapubic catheter
Advantages
  • Simple insertion; can be delegated to nursing staff
  • Few contraindications
  • Large-bore catheters allow bladder irrigation
  • Avoids urethral complications (injury, infection, stricture)
  • Lower risk of prostate and epididymal infections
  • Permits voiding trials with residual urine assessment
  • Generally better tolerated
Disadvantages
  • High complication rate: urethral injury, urethral stricture, infection
  • Poor patient tolerance
  • Voiding trial not feasible with a catheter in situ
  • Insertion requires a minor surgical procedure by a physician; change requires trained nursing staff
  • Multiple contraindications
  • Bladder irrigation is not possible
  • Rare but severe complications (e.g., bowel injury)

Contraindications for Transurethral Foley Catheters:

Catheterization: Technique of Transurethral Catheterization in Men

The use of a catheter set and the assistance of a second person facilitate catheter placement.

Difficult situations during transurethral catheterization:

Urethral strictures, false passages from failed attempts, or prostatic disease may complicate or even prevent transurethral catheterization. If a suprapubic catheter is not an option, the following measures may be considered:

Technique of Transurethral Catheterization in Women:

Difficult situations:

Obesity or vulvar atrophy may obscure the external urethral meatus. The following techniques may facilitate catheterization:

Complications of Transurethral Catheterization:

Injuries:

Particularly with rigid catheters, urethral injury, perforation, or false passage may occur due to a mucosal fold or urethral narrowing.

Urethral strictures:

Strictures may develop from infection or ischemic urethral injury. Risk factors include duration of catheterization, catheter size, and traction on the catheter.

Biofilm formation and obstruction:

The catheter surface is covered within hours by a host-derived biofilm of proteins and macromolecules. Bacterial colonization thickens the biofilm, which may obstruct the lumen if displaced or excessive in thickness.

Ascending infection:

Despite closed drainage, bacteria ascend extraluminally along the biofilm into the bladder. The bacteriuria rate increases by 3–10% per day of catheterization, with risk of clinical infection (cystitis, urethritis, prostatitis, epididymitis, or pyelonephritis). See also section urinary tract infections.

Balloon deflation failure:

Salt precipitation, damage to the balloon channel or valve may prevent balloon deflation and catheter removal. First, cut the catheter 10 cm proximal to the meatus to correct a valve defect. If unsuccessful, perforate the balloon channel with a rigid, fine stylet (e.g., from a ureteral catheter). If this fails, perform an ultrasound-guided suprapubic puncture of the balloon with a filled bladder.

Other complications:

Bladder stones; squamous cell bladder carcinoma (with very long-term catheterization).






Index: 1–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

References

Gambrill B, Pertusati F, Hughes SF, Shergill I, Prokopovich P. Materials-based incidence of urinary catheter associated urinary tract infections and the causative micro-organisms: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01565-x.

Robinson J. Urethral catheter selection. Nurs Stand. 2001 Mar 7-13;15(25):39-42. doi: 10.7748/ns2001.03.15.25.39.c2993.

Sökeland, J., Brühl, P., Hertle, L., and Piechota, H. (2000). Katheterdrainage der Harnblase heute.
Dtsch Arztebl, 97(4):A167-A174.



  Deutsche Version: Indikationen und Legetechnik für transurethrale Dauerkatheter



Urology-Textbook.com – Choose the Ad-Free, Professional Resource

This website is designed for physicians and medical professionals. It presents diseases of the genital organs through detailed text and images. Some content may not be suitable for children or sensitive readers. Many illustrations are available exclusively to Steady members. Are you a physician and interested in supporting this project? Join Steady to unlock full access to all images and enjoy an ad-free experience. Try it free for 7 days—no obligation.

New release: The first edition of the Urology Textbook as an e-book—ideal for offline reading and quick reference. With over 1300 pages and hundreds of illustrations, it’s the perfect companion for residents and medical students. After your 7-day trial has ended, you will receive a download link for your exclusive e-book.

-->