You are here: Urology Textbook > Surgical management > Surgical site infections
Surgical Site Infections (SSI): Causes, Prevention and Treatment
Superficial Incisional SSI:
Superficial incisional surgical site infection develops within 30 days near the skin incision; the infection is limited to tissue above the fascia. Defining criteria are pus discharge, organism detection in wound secretions, or iatrogenic opening of the incision.
Deep incisional SSI:
Deep incisional surgical site infection develops within 30 days (or within a year for implants), including tissues under the fascia. Defining criteria are pus discharge, organism detection in wound secretions, or iatrogenic opening of the incision, including deeper structures.
Organ or space infection:
Organ or space infection is an abscess or other signs of organ or body cavity infection. Defining criteria are purulent discharge after draining the cavity, detection with an appropriate examination (histology, radiology), or diagnosis during a reoperation.
Epidemiology: Risk of Surgical Wound Infections
The risk of surgical site infections depends on many factors (see the following sections). An important factor is the degree of contamination of the wound at the end of the operation (Wagenlehner et al., 2011a):
Clean Wound and Risk of SSI:
A clean wound is defined as an uninfected surgical wound without opening of the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract and without encountering inflammation. The most common organisms of SSI are staphylococci, and the risk is (in patients without risk factors) less than 2%.
Clean-contaminated Wound and Risk of SSI:
The gastrointestinal or urogenital tract was opened in a controlled manner and without unusual contamination of the wound. The risk for wound infection is 2–4% for urinary tract interventions and 5–10% for colon surgery. In addition to staphylococci, the most common pathogens for SSI are enterobacteria and enterococci. Anaerobe pathogens are possible after bowel surgery.
Contaminated Wound and Risk of SSI:
Wounds with uncontrolled contamination with infectious urine or gastrointestinal content or fresh traumatic wounds. The risk for wound infection is 10–15%, and the most common pathogens are similar to the category clean-contaminated.
Dirty-infected Wound and Risk of SSI:
Dirty-infected wounds result from surgical interventions in body regions with massive bacterial contamination from existing infections or old traumatic wounds. The risk for wound infection is 15–40%, and the most common pathogens are similar to the category clean-contaminated.
Risk Factors, Etiology and Pathogenesis
Surgical site infection begins with contamination (bacterial are inoculated into the wound), continues with colonization (establishment and proliferation of the pathogen), and may end in infection (local and systemic reaction of the immune system of the body, depending on pathogen concentration and virulence factors). The pathogenesis explains the interval between surgery and wound infection from several days to weeks.
Bacterial concentration in the wound:
The higher the bacterial concentration in the wound at the end of the operation, the more likely the wound infection will be.
Airborne bacterial contamination:
Airborne bacterial contamination is the major contributor to SSI. Airborne particles carry microorganisms, mainly Staphylococcus aureus, which settle on the surgeon's hands and instruments or sediment directly into the wound.
Bacterial contamination from the patient:
Bacteria from the skin, gastrointestinal or urogenital tract may enter the wound. Hematogenous infection is rare and is associated with implants.
Impairment of lymphatic drainage:
Surgery with impairment of the lymphatic drainage of the surgical wound (transection of the lymphatic vessels or removal of lymph nodes) increases the risk of wound infection, e.g., in radical inguinal lymphadenectomy (SSI up to 70%).
The bacterial destruction by phagocytes is oxygen-dependent. The bacteriocidal effect is due to the formation of superoxide radicals from molecular oxygen by the NADPH-coupled oxygenase. An oxygen deficiency of phagocytes inhibits their destructive function. Tissue hypoxia results from general hypoxia, volume depletion, pain, hypothermia, compression by retractors, traumatic preparation, and excessive coagulation. The resulting tissue hypoxia increases the incidence of wound infections (Hopf et al., 1997).
Wound hematoma and bleeding leading to blood transfusion are risk factors for SSI (Houbiers et al., 1997).
Suture material, mesh, or implants are risk factors for surgical site infections.
The following diseases increase the risk for SSI: cachexia, coagulopathies, shock and burns, polytrauma, diabetes mellitus, obesity, immunodeficiency, smoking, alcoholism, glucocorticoid therapy, existing infections in other organs (Pessaux et al., 2003).
Preoperative Measures for Prevention of SSI
Optimize patient risk factors:
Avoid malnutrition, reduce body weight in overweight, optimize diabetes, check heart and lung function, stop smoking 6 to 8 weeks before surgery, and avoid alcohol.
Minimizing the preoperative inpatient length of stay reduces the likelihood of nosocomial infection of the wound.
Not necessary for surgery of the small bowel, often used for urologic surgery using the colon; see section bowel preparation.
With antiseptic soap.
Shaving the surgical site increases the risk of wound infection, and micro-injuries with colonizing hospital germs are blamed. If hair removal is necessary, use an electric clipper just before surgery in the operating room (Kjonniksen et al., 2002).
Intraoperative Measures for Prevention of SSI
All measures concentrate on avoiding tissue hypoxia, a decisive risk factor for wound infection (Hopf et al., 1997). In some studies, the prophylactic increase of the inspiratory oxygen concentration reduced the wound infection rate.
Prevention of hypothermia:
Hypothermia leads to hypoxia due to vasoconstriction and shivering. In addition, hypothermia leads to an impairment of the immune system.
Prevention of hypovolemia:
Hypovolemia leads to hypotension, hypoperfusion, and, thus, hypoxia.
Avoidance of unnecessary blood transfusions:
Blood transfusions increase the risk of wound infections (Houbiers et al., 1997). The risk has to be judged against the consequences of hypovolemia and hypoxia due to anemia.
A mild increase in the carbon dioxide (CO2) level improves subcutaneous perfusion and may thus reduce the rate of wound infection (Akca et al., 2003). Hypocapnia should be avoided.
Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis:
See section perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
Prevention of bacterial contamination via the surgeon:
The individual surgeon is a risk factor for wound infection in many studies (Cuthbertson et al., 1991): protective factors are surgical hand disinfection, wearing double gloves, glove changes after contamination or prolonged surgery, occlusive surgical clothing (textile laminate, polypropylene), surgical mask, adherence to hygiene recommendations.
Prevention of airborne bacterial contamination:
Clean dust-free operation room, vertical laminar flow with filter system, few people present in the operating theater, minimization of conversations, shortest possible duration of surgery, disposible occlusive surgical clothing.
Minimize subcutaneous scalpel incisions, use moist laparotomy pads to protect wound edges, and hemostasis limited to the most necessary.
Available are alcoholic and aqueous disinfectant solutions with chlorhexidine, PVP-iodine, or octenidine. Skin disinfection (without mucous membranes) should be done with alcoholic solutions. Mucous membranes are disinfected using aqueous solutions. In abdominal surgery, using plastic adhesive drapes to protect the wound from dermal bacteria is likely ineffective. Before skin closure, disinfection of the wound edges should be repeated.
Avoid excessive bleeding:
Hematomas, blood transfusions, and intraoperative hypotension resulting from bleeding are risk factors for SSI (Jensen et al., 1990b) (Houbiers et al., 1997).
Saline wound irrigation is a way to remove blood, sedimented bacteria, and particles in elective surgery with clean wounds. For contaminated wounds, additional use of an antiseptic is possible, most preferably polyhexanide or octenidine. The benefit of wound irrigation is controversial.
Subcutaneous wound closure:
The use of subcutaneous suction drainage or subcutaneous sutures is controversial. The drainage could be the entry port for bacteria, and subcutaneous sutures lead to ischemia. In lean patients, additional subcutaneous closure is not necessary. Subcutaneous sutures, e.g., after a Caesarean section, proved beneficial in obese patients (Chelmow et al., 2004).
Skin closure is possible using metal clips, skin suture with monofilament non-resorbable suture material or intracutaneous stitches with resorbable monofilament suture material without significant differences in surgical sites infections (Cochetti et al., 2020). Patients prefer intracutaneous suture techniques with cosmetically attractive results. Small trocar incisions after laparoscopic procedures can be closed quickly and equivalently without suturing with wound closure strips.
Postoperative Measures for Prevention of SSI
Wound dressings have a minor effect on the wound infection rate since SSI results from bacterial contamination during the operation and due to the patient's risk factors. The standard of care is dry gauze dressings; hydrocolloid dressings are more expensive and have no measurable clinical benefits. Randomized trials proved the early dispensability of the wound dressing (Merei et al., 2004). Early postoperative showering does not increase the incidence of wound infections (Neues et al., 2000).
Sufficient analgesia reduces vasoconstriction, increases tissue oxygen tension, and thus significantly reduces the rate of wound infection (Akca et al., 1999).
Blood glucose control:
Physiological glucose concentrations reduce the risk of wound infection (Lazar et al., 2004). In diabetic patients, blood glucose levels should stay below 200 mg/dl.
Treatment of Wound Infection
Ubi pus, ibi evacua is the Latin aphorism of local therapy: reopen the wound, drain the pus, and irrigate the wound. Perform a wound swab to determine the resistance of bacteria. Smaller wounds should heal with secondary intention. Larger wounds are treated with secondary healing until clean granulating wound surfaces are reached; a secondary suture can shorten the wound healing time. Alternatively or additionally, vacuum therapy can accelerate wound healing.
Start with a calculated antibiotic treatment depending on the expected bacteria. If necessary, change the antibiotic treatment after obtaining the results of the wound swab.
Index: 1–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Akca u.a. 2003 AKCA, O. ; LIEM, E. ;
SULEMAN, M. I. ; DOUFAS, A. G. ; GALANDIUK, S. ;
SESSLER, D. I.:
Effect of intra-operative end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure
on tissue oxygenation.
58 (2003), Nr. 6, S. 536–42
Akca u.a. 1999 AKCA, O. ; MELISCHEK, M. ;
SCHECK, T. ; HELLWAGNER, K. ; ARKILIC, C. F. ;
KURZ, A. ; KAPRAL, S. ; HEINZ, T. ;
LACKNER, F. X. ; SESSLER, D. I.:
Postoperative pain and subcutaneous oxygen tension.
354 (1999), Nr. 9172, S. 41–2
Allen u.a. 1997 ALLEN, D. B. ; MAGUIRE,
J. J. ; MAHDAVIAN, M. ; WICKE, C. ; MARCOCCI, L. ;
SCHEUENSTUHL, H. ; CHANG, M. ; LE, A. X. ;
HOPF, H. W. ; HUNT, T. K.:
Wound hypoxia and acidosis limit neutrophil bacterial killing
In: Arch Surg
132 (1997), Nr. 9, S. 991–6
Babior 1978a BABIOR, B. M.:
Oxygen-dependent microbial killing by phagocytes (first of two
In: N Engl J Med
298 (1978), Nr. 12, S. 659–68
Babior 1978b BABIOR, B. M.:
Oxygen-dependent microbial killing by phagocytes (second of two
In: N Engl J Med
298 (1978), Nr. 13, S. 721–5
G. Cochetti et al., “Surgical wound closure by staples or sutures?,” Medicine, vol. 99, no. 25, p. e20573, 2020.
Cummings 1994 CUMMINGS, P.:
Antibiotics to prevent infection in patients with dog bite wounds: a
meta-analysis of randomized trials.
In: Ann Emerg Med
23 (1994), Nr. 3, S. 535–40
Cuthbertson u.a. 1991 CUTHBERTSON, A. M. ;
MCLEISH, A. R. ; PENFOLD, J. C. ; ROSS, H.:
A comparison between single and double dose intravenous Timentin for
the prophylaxis of wound infection in elective colorectal surgery.
In: Dis Colon Rectum
34 (1991), Nr. 2, S. 151–5
Edwards u.a. 2004 EDWARDS, P. S. ; LIPP, A. ;
Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound
infections after clean surgery.
In: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2004), Nr. 3, S. CD003949
Frishman u.a. 1997 FRISHMAN, G. N. ; SCHWARTZ,
T. ; HOGAN, J. W.:
Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular
In: J Reprod Med
42 (1997), Nr. 10, S. 627–30
Grantcharov und Rosenberg 2001 GRANTCHAROV, T. P. ;
Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery.
In: Eur J Surg
167 (2001), Nr. 4, S. 260–7
Hopf u.a. 1997 HOPF, H. W. ; HUNT, T. K. ;
WEST, J. M. ; BLOMQUIST, P. ; GOODSON, 3rd ;
JENSEN, J. A. ; JONSSON, K. ; PATY, P. B. ;
RABKIN, J. M. ; UPTON, R. A. ; SMITTEN, K. von ;
WHITNEY, J. D.:
Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in
In: Arch Surg
132 (1997), Nr. 9, S. 997–1004; discussion 1005
Houbiers u.a. 1997 HOUBIERS, J. G. ; VELDE,
C. J. van de ; WATERING, L. M. van de ; HERMANS, J. ;
SCHREUDER, S. ; BIJNEN, A. B. ; PAHLPLATZ, P. ;
SCHATTENKERK, M. E. ; WOBBES, T. ; VRIES, J. E.
de ; KLEMENTSCHITSCH, P. ; MAAS, A. H. van de ;
Transfusion of red cells is associated with increased incidence of
bacterial infection after colorectal surgery: a prospective study.
37 (1997), Nr. 2, S. 126–34
Jensen u.a. 1990 JENSEN, L. S. ; ANDERSEN,
A. ; FRISTRUP, S. C. ; HOLME, J. B. ; HVID,
H. M. ; KRAGLUND, K. ; RASMUSSEN, P. C. ;
Comparison of one dose versus three doses of prophylactic
antibiotics, and the influence of blood transfusion, on infectious
complications in acute and elective colorectal surgery.
In: Br J Surg
77 (1990), Nr. 5, S. 513–8
Johnson u.a. 1997 JOHNSON, R. G. ; COHN,
W. E. ; THURER, R. L. ; MCCARTHY, J. R. ; SIROIS,
C. A. ; WEINTRAUB, R. M.:
Cutaneous closure after cardiac operations: a controlled, randomized,
prospective comparison of intradermal versus staple closures.
In: Ann Surg
226 (1997), Nr. 5, S. 606–12
Kjonniksen u.a. 2002 KJONNIKSEN, I. ;
ANDERSEN, B. M. ; SONDENAA, V. G. ; SEGADAL, L.:
Preoperative hair removal-a systematic literature review.
In: Aorn J
75 (2002), Nr. 5, S. 928–38, 940
Lazar u.a. 2004 LAZAR, H. L. ; CHIPKIN,
S. R. ; FITZGERALD, C. A. ; BAO, Y. ; CABRAL, H. ;
APSTEIN, C. S.:
Tight glycemic control in diabetic coronary artery bypass graft
patients improves perioperative outcomes and decreases recurrent ischemic
109 (2004), Nr. 12, S. 1497–502
Locker u.a. 1983 LOCKER, D. ; NORWOOD, S. H. ;
TORMA, M. J. ; FONTENELLE, L. J.:
A prospective randomized study of drained and undrained
In: Am Surg
49 (1983), Nr. 10, S. 528–30
Maartense u.a. 2002 MAARTENSE, S. ; BEMELMAN,
W. A. ; DUNKER, M. S. ; LINT, C. de ; PIERIK,
E. G. ; BUSCH, O. R. ; GOUMA, D. J.:
Randomized study of the effectiveness of closing laparoscopic trocar
wounds with octylcyanoacrylate, adhesive papertape or poliglecaprone.
In: Br J Surg
89 (2002), Nr. 11, S. 1370–5
McCray u.a. 1986 MCCRAY, E. ; MARTONE, W. J. ;
WISE, R. P. ; CULVER, D. H.:
Risk factors for wound infections after genitourinary reconstructive
In: Am J Epidemiol
123 (1986), Nr. 6, S. 1026–32
Medeiros und Saconato 2001 MEDEIROS, I. ;
Antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites.
In: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2001), Nr. 2, S. CD001738
Merei 2004 MEREI, J. M.:
Pediatric clean surgical wounds: is dressing necessary?
In: J Pediatr Surg
39 (2004), Nr. 12, S. 1871–3
Mishriki u.a. 1990 MISHRIKI, S. F. ; LAW,
D. J. ; JEFFERY, P. J.:
Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative wound infection.
In: J Hosp Infect
16 (1990), Nr. 3, S. 223–30
Moller u.a. 2002 MOLLER, A. M. ; VILLEBRO,
N. ; PEDERSEN, T. ; TONNESEN, H.:
Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative
complications: a randomised clinical trial.
359 (2002), Nr. 9301, S. 114–7
Monson u.a. 1991 MONSON, J. R. ; GUILLOU,
P. J. ; KEANE, F. B. ; TANNER, W. A. ; BRENNAN,
Cholecystectomy is safer without drainage: the results of a
prospective, randomized clinical trial.
109 (1991), Nr. 6, S. 740–6
Moro u.a. 1996 MORO, M. L. ; CARRIERI, M. P. ;
TOZZI, A. E. ; LANA, S. ; GRECO, D.:
Risk factors for surgical wound infections in clean surgery: a
multicenter study. Italian PRINOS Study Group.
In: Ann Ital Chir
67 (1996), Nr. 1, S. 13–9
Neues und Haas 2000 NEUES, C. ; HAAS, E.:
[Modification of postoperative wound healing by showering].
71 (2000), Nr. 2, S. 234–6
Pessaux u.a. 2003 PESSAUX, P. ; MSIKA, S. ;
ATALLA, D. ; HAY, J. M. ; FLAMANT, Y.:
Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in
noncolorectal abdominal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a
prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients.
In: Arch Surg
138 (2003), Nr. 3, S. 314–24
Sakka u.a. 1995 SAKKA, S. A. ; GRAHAM, K. ;
Skin closure in hip surgery: subcuticular versus transdermal. A
prospective randomized study.
In: Acta Orthop Belg
61 (1995), Nr. 4, S. 331–6
A. W. Partin, C. A. Peters, L. R. Kavoussi, R. R. Dmochowski, and A. J. Wein, Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology, 12th ed. ISBN-13: 978-1455775675: Elsevier, 2020.
van 't Riet u.a. 2002 RIET, M. van 't ;
STEYERBERG, E. W. ; NELLENSTEYN, J. ; BONJER,
H. J. ; JEEKEL, J.:
Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal
In: Br J Surg
89 (2002), Nr. 11, S. 1350–6
Wikblad und Anderson 1995 WIKBLAD, K. ;
A comparison of three wound dressings in patients undergoing heart
In: Nurs Res
44 (1995), Nr. 5, S. 312–6
Yang und Longaker 2003 YANG, G. P. ; LONGAKER,
Abstinence from smoking reduces incisional wound infection: a
randomized, controlled trial.
In: Ann Surg
238 (2003), Nr. 1, S. 6–8
Zimmerli 1998 ZIMMERLI, W.:
[Antibiotic therapy in surgery].
69 (1998), Nr. 12, S. 1392–8
Deutsche Version: Ursachen, Prävention und Therapie der postoperativen Wundinfektion